So I've had a couple PM's about how to do this move. I figure I should share what I came up with with everyone, so here it is:
How to learn the 'Mercedes'
Skills you should probably have to build up to this move:
a) Thread-the-Needle, split-time TTN is better, the 3-beat or 4-beat split-time TTN is best. These will teach your hands how to pass each other in butterfly with out getting all tangled up.
b)Long Arm aka giant/extended spin. Make a big, slow, clean circle with your entire arm and the poi. Spin it in the wall plane in front of you.
c)Anti-spin Flowers. Your poi spins in one direction wile your arm spins a giant circle in the opposite direction, hence you are anti-spinning. Learn to spin a trifoil (3 petals) anti-spin flower in the wall plane in front of you.
d) Polyrhythmic spinning. Spin one long arm in front of you. For every one long arm spin try to spin two regular spins, in the opposite direction, in front of you; like a butterfly. This is spinning 1:2. Now try 1:3. You will use a small threading motion as the long arm passes the arm that is static spinning.
e) Now put it all together. Try to keep your hands near each other so they now both go around the big circle. The goal is to keep them right near each other the whole time and use the threading motion to keep them from tangling at one point in their path. The hand that is spinning in the opposite direction as the giant circle will be doing a trifoil anti-spin flower, surrounded by the giant circle!
A tip AKA further confusion: when you anti-spin a move your arm spinning in the opposite direction as the poi subtracts a circle from the poi. So if you have 4 foils (petals) you'll only have your poi do 3 cycles. For this move 3 foils means you really only have 2 cycles, to complete one repetition.
-Alien Jon
How to learn the 'Mercedes'
Skills you should probably have to build up to this move:
a) Thread-the-Needle, split-time TTN is better, the 3-beat or 4-beat split-time TTN is best. These will teach your hands how to pass each other in butterfly with out getting all tangled up.
b)Long Arm aka giant/extended spin. Make a big, slow, clean circle with your entire arm and the poi. Spin it in the wall plane in front of you.
c)Anti-spin Flowers. Your poi spins in one direction wile your arm spins a giant circle in the opposite direction, hence you are anti-spinning. Learn to spin a trifoil (3 petals) anti-spin flower in the wall plane in front of you.
d) Polyrhythmic spinning. Spin one long arm in front of you. For every one long arm spin try to spin two regular spins, in the opposite direction, in front of you; like a butterfly. This is spinning 1:2. Now try 1:3. You will use a small threading motion as the long arm passes the arm that is static spinning.
e) Now put it all together. Try to keep your hands near each other so they now both go around the big circle. The goal is to keep them right near each other the whole time and use the threading motion to keep them from tangling at one point in their path. The hand that is spinning in the opposite direction as the giant circle will be doing a trifoil anti-spin flower, surrounded by the giant circle!
A tip AKA further confusion: when you anti-spin a move your arm spinning in the opposite direction as the poi subtracts a circle from the poi. So if you have 4 foils (petals) you'll only have your poi do 3 cycles. For this move 3 foils means you really only have 2 cycles, to complete one repetition.
-Alien Jon
-
Re: Mercedes how-to
Tue, January 15, 2008 - 1:37 AMSo, at some point I saw someone's tutorial video on this move, but can't remember where or who. Anyone know where to find it? It would be a great accompaniment to this thread!
-Alien Jon -
-
Re: Mercedes how-to
Tue, January 15, 2008 - 4:41 AMSo polyrhthm hybrid butterflys are called mercedes now? I must say it's alot less unwieldy to say, unless it only applies to the 3-petal version. Then I guess the 4 petal ones would still be 4:1 hybrid bf's or some such nonsense.
As for that tut, I think you are referring to a video by Durbs that was posted on HoP or at least that is where I first saw this pattern. It had alot of good poly flower stuff in there.
Oh and strangely enough I was mucking around the other night with these, trying to relate some double staff pattern stuff to poi, and found a couple totally awesome transitions and was planning on sharing them here next time I found myself online.
While doing a 4 "petal mercedes" with the left poi doing the antispin, you can stall the longarm poi at anytime and fluidly transition into an antispin buzzsaw fountain. While doing the anti buzz ftn, stall the left poi while continuing the antispin pattern with the right and you'll go right into a rev 4 petal mercedes. Of course you can stall either hand in any of these moves (same opp mercedes and normal antispin buzzsaw fountains) and you'll get a different effect or transition. This is also only one combination, fwd 4 petal mercedes to antispin buzzsaw fountain to rev 4 petal mercedes all with your arms moving in a counterclockwise direction there are a plethora of other combinations and they all look pretty cool.
I hope the above paragraph makes sense because I probably won't be online again for days at the earliest to straighten it out if it came out wrong. Until then, happy spinning.
-
-
Re: Mercedes how-to
Tue, January 15, 2008 - 11:17 AM"Mercedes", eh? Cute :P
And this from Mr. "Alien Code" too! [heckle heckle heckle]
And for those who didn't get this from the post (it took me a second), the "mercedes" is a 3:1 hybrid butterfly :P -
-
-
Re: Mercedes how-to
Tue, January 15, 2008 - 11:31 AMNo! Anti-brids/head-isos are the exact opposite, where the head of one poi is traced by the other hand. This move is traditional hybrid, and as a result has both hands held together through the entire move (see alien's original post). Although one should note both moves are 3:1. {side note: this similarity of notation and conceptual translation is why I first called the moves "anti-brids". The similarity of name to "hybrid" communicates the concepts that are mirrored between the two genres of move} -
-
Unsu...
Re: Mercedes how-to
Tue, January 15, 2008 - 11:34 AMahhh....yes. trying to get the hang of the linguistics.
-
Re: Mercedes how-to
Tue, January 15, 2008 - 11:37 AMThanks for the tut John, solid technique.
But i am not so much into the naming things to they are less clear concept...
I can buy Baz's (sorta) the anti-bryd name, it means something directly associated with the trick.
But Mercedes? Ehhhhh.... -
-
Unsu...
Re: Mercedes how-to
Tue, January 15, 2008 - 11:43 AMit is related though, as the visual pattern is the mercedes symbol! i think its ok for specified poi maneuvers to have a " common name" as well as the more exacting tech personification....like a plant. only a botanist knows the latin name, but it is more exact then the common name...
-
-
-
-
Re: Mercedes how-to
Tue, January 15, 2008 - 11:56 AMI didn't coin the term: www.homeofpoi.com/ubbthread...t/all/vc/1
;-P if I had my druthers everyone would use sentence or paragraph long names... all in Deutsch!!!
Here comes the swift destruction of any neat/clean naming:
Mercedes originally referred to the trifoil, cuz that is what people played with 1st... but do we start using the nice, single word name to meen the family inclusive of "extension/longarm vs n-petaled antispin"?!?!?
I say why not, knowing full well this is potentially the type of mess I argue about later. ;-P -
-
Re: Mercedes how-to
Tue, January 15, 2008 - 12:53 PMMercedes was a term thrown around on the HOP forum, it was also not completely liked by everyone on the thread.
(I'm with Simian, tis a lame word)
FYI for everyone out there, HOP=home of poi, the largest spinning forum in the world. I think a lot of good content comes from there.... but it shouldn't (I have done it too )be constantly resourced as an authority very often.
We may be able to point people to discussions but if WE on tribe agree on mercedes, I might buy it, as of now- for me it doesn't help anyone understand what we are talking about....IMHO.
Nonetheless I appreciate your work John...
-
Re: Mercedes how-to
Tue, January 15, 2008 - 3:19 PMPersonally, I thought "longarm hybrid butterfly" was a short enough name... (as the antispin is implied by the hybridization of the butterfly)
[my voice joins Noel's in praising Alien's instructions, however]
That said, I *do not* advocate calling all longarm hybrids "longbrids"...although the thought had occurred to me :P -
-
Re: Mercedes how-to
Tue, January 15, 2008 - 6:04 PMactually, half antispin hybrids are only one set of a number of different types of bf hybrids -
-
Re: Mercedes how-to
Tue, January 15, 2008 - 6:41 PMBollocks - You're using the MCP definition which has been deemed unsuitable for poi. The "2 driving styles" was discarded in favor of the "hands together" line of thinking about 6 months ago, if you recall. if the hands are together and one goes even a little bit giant, the other will go antispin to an equal and directly proportional degree. -
-
Re: Mercedes how-to
Tue, January 15, 2008 - 6:44 PMIf, however you are using Olive's unit circle variations as the basis for your thinking, then you might have a point. However, I would stipulate that the unit circle hybrid thinking should be classified as "unit circle hybrids" as opposed to "classic hybrids" as I denoted earlier.
-
Re: Mercedes how-to
Wed, January 16, 2008 - 2:12 AM"You're using the MCP definition which has been deemed unsuitable for poi. "
Whoa there! I had a definition? What is it? And what is it of?
Sweeeeeeeeeeeet.
-
-
-
Re: Mercedes how-to
Wed, January 16, 2008 - 2:39 PMIf we're talking naming, I'd like to vote against anything being called "longarm". A silly name, and not entirely descriptive. We're talking about extensions, and if you extend as far as you can, you are at the "longarm" place. But there are lots of other practical extensions that don't reach that extreme.
But whatever. every motion and every pattern could be described in a variety of ways, depending on what part of the motion you're analyzing, and your own path of arrival at that pattern. Pretty soon it'll all be so complex (and person-specific) that video will be the only way to be clear about what's happening.
Besides, many of our descriptions only make sense from the CENTER of the pattern (where we stand when we spin). Looked at from the outside of the pattern, complex patterns are tough to recognize.
-
-
-
-
Re: Mercedes how-to
Tue, January 15, 2008 - 10:46 PMYeah Zan, I once was able to pull off a Mitsubishi with 3 poi!!! So , is that a triple stack? *_*
I think Melvenorc12 is well versed with the triple stack ;-P
check this out:
www.youtube.com/watch -
-
Re: Mercedes how-to
Wed, January 16, 2008 - 4:22 AMwow :)
amazing video !!
I've been playing w/ triples for a while (following the path of our Godfather Andy), but I had never seen a triples GScer in action .. hummm these warp combos
beautiful :D
thanks for the link Alien
-
-
-
Re: Mercedes how-to
Tue, January 15, 2008 - 7:13 PMI'm having a little trouble getting the antispin to exactly three with this one, but I actually found it a lot easier to slide into a crossed arm version of this pattern. I guess thats a crossed arm 3:1 antispin:extended polyrythmic atomic, but I'm not up to date on the latest poi definitions and I'm kinda new to this stuff. It's not a 45 degree angle, but the planes are at a 15 or 20 degree angle cross and the poi start in split time with my arms crossed. -
-
Re: Mercedes how-to
Tue, January 15, 2008 - 8:17 PMMercedes sounds like the name of your highschool prom date, who you did in the back of a limo.
And what would the bmw look like? -
-
Re: Mercedes how-to
Tue, January 15, 2008 - 10:10 PMIt was a BMW limo, so that is what it would look like... and can you blame me for getting all nostalgic about doing my prom date and wanting to name a poi move after her! -
-
Re: Mercedes how-to
Tue, January 15, 2008 - 10:39 PMI'd say that in light of Unit Circle hybrids you need to include poly in the name to differentiate from 1-beat bfly hybrids (Unit Circle is my adaptation of Olives math to 1-beat patterns so as to excluded the need for some being polyrhythmic, BTW Baz >_^) Also, I think there is still gray area on the whole hands together definition. In Andy's original post about Hybrid moves on HOP, he implies anti-brid hybrids with this statement:
"So with hybrid moves: If you spin your hands sametime the Poi swing splittime and ***the other way round***."
See the post here:
www.homeofpoi.com/ubbthread...owflat.php
I'd just as soon go with Andy's OG post as "Classic Hybrids". I like to make the" Unit Circle Hybrid" addendum. Anti-brid to me is a definition juxtaposed against "hands together hybrids", and so has overlapping meaning with both possible "classic hybrids"... but goes on to include the anti-brid style unit circle hybrids, along with bfly poly head orbiting and what not. To me anti-brid definitely includes both static and isolated versions... I have wavered back and forth on whether or not I include static vs extension in hybrids, and at this point I don't include it since it's neither the classic def nor is it hand following. My vote is of course still on a more general class, or even aproach to spinning: Composite.
-Alien Jon -
-
Re: Mercedes how-to
Wed, January 16, 2008 - 4:57 AMback to the subject>
the way I teach hybrid flowa, is based on a "driving-style" progression
you start circling this one: { static pendulum ; antispin }
then { moving pendulum ; antispin }
then { giant ; antispin }
this is coming from the fact that you can shape a circle from circling a pendulum, and accelerating it will create tension in the cord, and finally shape a giant circle
for instance: your left hand is circling an antispin in wall-plane, place your right hand below you left hand and let the poi do nothing (you're circling a pendulum). This pendulum will take some momentum from the circling inertia, and if you accelerate your shoulder rotational speed, you'll end up doing {giant ; antispin}
So the above list (1st post) is IMO good but way too long (sufficient but not necessary)
off topicness>
I already found the thread on HoP rubbish .. what's the point in giving a name to each particular pattern !!
Anything dealing w/ unit-circles and cat-eyes are defenetly Alien's technology ;)
I hardly been working on {isolation ; giant}, which I now tend to nickname AndyBrid .. LoL
And my math - as you call it - is just Nick Woolsey's math mixed up w/ driving-style hand combination (composites)
so Big Up to Nick
Anyway, I'm putting a lot of effort at the moment, in trying to obtain my boss/customer approvals for my holydays in May .. I wanna come teach hybrid-flowa at Firedrum :D
I'm fed up with writing long rant, everything is so much easier in real life
.. well, humm
after re-reading what you guys wrote ... I'm not that sure .. LOL -
-
Re: Mercedes how-to
Wed, January 16, 2008 - 12:20 PMYESSSSS! Come to Firedrums!!!! -
-
Re: Mercedes how-to
Wed, January 16, 2008 - 12:25 PM...and yeah "Olives math" is a silly mutation of that bit in that other thread where you talked about "doing the math". I love how these conversations mutate into silly ideas. The confusion is both Hilarious and helps breed new ideas. Luca would be proud!
for peeps who haven't read the techpoi.tribes hybrid thread:
techpoi.tribe.net/thread/78...d54c0dc644
-
-
Re: Mercedes how-to
Thu, January 17, 2008 - 9:24 PMOlive - what I meant was this: With your series of hybrid combos, and with Alien Jon's animations of those unit-circle hybrid variations, you get a series of hybrids that I have been (for better or worse) classifying as the "Unit circle hybrids" - a generic term for all hybrids that follow the general parameters that you put forth. They differentiate from the very narrow class of "classic hybrids" that require the hands staying together throughout the move. Both of these are a step away from the "2 driving styles" definition of hybrids that include, but are not limited to, the U.C.Hybrids and Classic Hybrids, and I gravitate towards them in order to push the move towards a clear way to define which hybrid one is doing at any given point. I look forward to the point where "2A class D Hybrid" (for example) brings forth immediate understanding, and those wishing to learn it ask for it by name :P -
-
Re: Mercedes how-to
Fri, January 18, 2008 - 7:48 AMGot your point Baz :)
I just don't agree w/ the "hands together" pre-requisite for "classic hybrid"
and I'll explain what I understood from Andy's approach:
To make an AndyBrid, you spin a giant with a shorter poi & an isolation with a long poi.
this difference in poi length is here to make both circles match in overall pattern shape, (as it looks more impressive and .... is even harder to execute)
The main visual effect has always been that when you move your hands same-time (1A hands together) the poi move split-time, when you move your hands split-time (2A hands appart) the poi move same-time.
When I say hands split-time, both of your arm are not stretched (as in standard extended pirouette), as you're doing a super tough move using some isolation. They're just appart from each other, moving like when you do same-time wall-plane isolated weaving (gotta take some time to dissect Ronan's video so that I can give you the timeline of each move)
What's less obvious - as it was first shown by Andy in "weave" - is that this property is also valid in butterfly (where your hands are really NOT together)
So try to do it in butterfly, and you'll experience that
when you move your hand from side to side (they are kinda translating from side to side in alternate, ie, in split-time) your poi butterfly will look same-time (crossover point / pattern intercepting UP & DOWN)
and vice versa, if you move your hand up & down (same time butterfly hand movement), your poi will look split-time butterfly (crossover point / pattern intercepting side to side)
Now to compare it to composites ;) ...
- The way Andy showed them at the time, was stationnary/static pattern; thought you can move it around (Rob/Bluecat has a video of an AndyBrid foutain on fire; and I think PineApplePete has something similar too, but not fully isolated).
- As you're isolating, your arms are not stretched !
Whereas with hybrid flowers I'm trying to mix Nick's style of body move (extended arms circling/pirouetting) with different driving-style combination.
So far I've mostly experience these flower up to {giant, spin/nips} combination, as isolation is really a different story ;) Especially that it implies another level in polyrythmy
Same for Alien's UC Hybrid, as his driving styles (cat's eye ..) are uber difficult
conclusion: better start learning them without the isolation
{pendulum, spin} then {giant, spin}
when you master these, then move toward the next step, in driving-style combination:
- {giant, isolation}
- badass Unit Circles Alien technology
- moving around an AndyBrid
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Re: Mercedes how-to
Thu, January 17, 2008 - 11:37 PMdude, no no no no no no no no
fuck naming moves
lets make logical sense
3 to 1
3 to 1
antispin
makes sense.
please...... please....
i haven't posted in ages......
i haven't read about poi in ages.
but a 3 to 1 antispin being called a mercedes....... damn.... i thought that was a the name of a baby conceived on a reality t.v. show........
me = spin meteor, work several jobs, learn flamenco guitar.... and wonder what went wrong and where..... yeah... i should read every reply before i post.........
over n out -
-
Re: Mercedes how-to
Fri, January 18, 2008 - 1:35 AMLucas:
3 petals to 1 big circle or 2 rotations to one big rotation (same thing different focus)...?
or is it 3 to 0 per cycle from the vantage point of the hands circling (who's orientation to the body is constantly changing)?!...
Zan:
I agree on the long arm thing. I prefer to think extension, too.
Olive:
Awesome approach, that pendulum progression!
Rovo:
Nope, it wasn't the Durbs vid... I stumbled onto it on you tube I think... but sweet buzzsaw switchy fun!
What I like about this thread is that it has confused the champion of 'confusion breeding poi innovation' (and undoubtedly others that read it), and it brings together in one place several of the relevant points of view not only on the specific move, the ideas of "hybrids" in general, and the broad concept of classification. So that way people who are familiar with one name and/or point of view will start to see how that plugs in with all the other points of view.
When people who where that same colored glasses get together they reinforce each other's world view and delve deeper. When people who where different colored glasses get together they can reveal things to each other that have gone unseen.
Keep it coming!!!
-Alien Jon -
-
Re: Mercedes how-to
Fri, January 18, 2008 - 2:07 AMAlien is tired (run over?). All spelloratng is delebrit!!!!
Actually what i meant was:
When people who wear the same colored glasses get together, they reinforce each other's world view and delve deeper. When people who wear different colored glasses get together, they can reveal things to each other that have gone unseen. -
-
Re: Mercedes how-to
Fri, January 18, 2008 - 6:51 AMso what classifies a "hybrid" these days? I'm out of loop on the internet geekery front. But I'm teaching a workshop on "hybrids" next weekend and I don't wanna be telling people names that were left behind months ago. Has anybody agreed on this yet? Two driving styles makes sense, but it also doesn't differentiate at all between polyrythms... -
-
Re: Mercedes how-to
Fri, January 18, 2008 - 8:06 AM2 driving-style is enought ;)
I personnally never gave a f*** about trying to reach a certain polyrythmy
The only think I make my student concentrate on, is keeping their hands circling movement
The poi polyrythmy will follow what you try to do with your hands (here circling in a certain harmony)
Then with time and practice, you'll surely be able to slow down your extension so that you can place even more circles with the hand doing the antispin (or spin) -
-
Re: Mercedes how-to
Fri, January 18, 2008 - 10:27 AMNo it isn't! We don't yet have enough of an established nomenclature to denote the TYPE of hybrid if we expand the term as far as you want to. If we use the expansive "2 driving styles", we lack a way to efficiently describe which driving styles are present!
Your system isn't a) organized and b) popularized enough yet to make it a commonly used system of description. It also is, at this point, somewhat limited. How, with terminology, do we quickly separate the longarm "Mercedes" (shudder) with the unit circle hybrid trifoil butterfly? -
-
Re: Mercedes how-to
Fri, January 18, 2008 - 1:27 PMWhen we say unit circle, in most cases we are talking about the smallest possible circle the poi can make which would be an isolation?
Am I wrong? -
-
Re: Mercedes how-to
Fri, January 18, 2008 - 11:15 PMNoel: Yeah, unit circle is definitely same diameter as isolation... and like I said if anyone has a better name for the concept than 'unit circle' that won't scare newbs or whatever Noel-was worried about, please feel free to propose it!
Doing a unit-circle mercedes (poly bf trifoil vs iso, I shudder at vs cateye), with hands same-time OR split-time is F*ing hard! Props to the second or 2 that Thomas does at 6:12 in this video: www.youtube.com/watch
French Saltimbanque has an interesting idea with " Continious Assembly Patterns" (CAP) in this thread on HoP: www.homeofpoi.com/ubbthread...Post859263
BTW does anyone know Saltimbanque? It isn't Damien is it? I met a Damien from France that seems like he was on to an earlier version of CAP. Olive, do you know this Damien? -
-
This is the maximum depth. Additional responses will not be threaded.
Re: Mercedes how-to
Sat, January 19, 2008 - 1:36 PMHoly cow - that guy is very good!
-
This is the maximum depth. Additional responses will not be threaded.
Re: Mercedes how-to
Mon, January 21, 2008 - 1:06 AMNever heard about that guy, nor Damien .. I dunno very well the French community (I'm mostly travelling out of France)
-
This is the maximum depth. Additional responses will not be threaded.
Re: Mercedes how-to
Thu, January 24, 2008 - 3:42 PMSorry to get in this so late, but you said "unit circle is definitely same diameter as isolation". Does that mean a unit circle is something different from an isolation? What is this concept that "if anyone has a better name for the concept than 'unit circle'"? I've not heard this term outside of this thread. -
-
Re: Mercedes how-to
Fri, January 25, 2008 - 12:12 AMPhyr Phreak,
Here about 'Unit Circle':
techpoi.tribe.net/thread/7d...ef100ae18e
techpoi.tribe.net/thread/78...d1690feb64
Here is my animation:
www.youtube.com/watch
-Alien Jon
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-